<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running HSRP for Availability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/</link>
	<description>Not something you want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:31:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Conaway</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Conaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-4511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely right, Chris.  That was a horrible, horrible mistake on my part.  I blame my coworkers and my ADD.  Corrected.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely right, Chris.  That was a horrible, horrible mistake on my part.  I blame my coworkers and my ADD.  Corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>Your saying in HSRP that he LOWER priority is the active router and the higher priority is the standby... ? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your saying in HSRP that he LOWER priority is the active router and the higher priority is the standby&#8230; ? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron&#8217;s Worthless Words &#187; Object Tracking and HSRP</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron&#8217;s Worthless Words &#187; Object Tracking and HSRP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] number of 100 that tracks the line protocol of interface S0/0. Now what? If we look back to the HSRP setup we have, two routers with HSRP running on each of the FastEthernets. If we add an interface S0/0 for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number of 100 that tracks the line protocol of interface S0/0. Now what? If we look back to the HSRP setup we have, two routers with HSRP running on each of the FastEthernets. If we add an interface S0/0 for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
